President Trump and his team are under a relentless media blitz campaign which has only one goal: Pressuring the president to concede the election and stop asking questions about suspicious behavior in decisive states. Thuggish CNN anchor Jake Tapper is openly proposing that those who question the election result should have their careers ruined.

The sheer intensity of this campaign is proof enough that Trump should not concede. A campaign this brazen can only be motivated by one thing: Fear. Democrats and their press adjuncts fear what a full investigation of last week’s vote might reveal.

President Trump must continue his campaign. But the president must not act alone. State-level Republicans must rally behind him and conduct a full audit of the election results. If enough evidence of fraud is found, these state-level Republicans must be prepared to assemble state legislators in emergency sessions to choose slates of pro-Trump electors. Such an action is not illegal. In fact, in the face of glaring illegality, it is both a constitutional and moral duty.

State legislators in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, and other disputed states should declare openly, right now, that they will only accept a Joe Biden victory after a thorough and complete investigation of all potential voter fraud in every state where the electoral outcome is contested. If these investigations are obstructed by the left, then they can and must exercise their Constitutional power to choose electors that restore the will of the people.

This is not only a moral necessity to restore dignity and legitimacy to our nation’s electoral system — it is entirely constitutional. Having state lawmakers choose electors is not a new concept. Federal law already gives legislatures the exact power to do this. 

As most Americans know, the U.S. president is not elected directly by the public but is instead chosen by the Electoral College. Few people, though, know the exact manner in which the Electoral College chooses the president.

The actual Electoral College election is governed by the Electoral Count Act, an 1887 law amended in 1948. Among other things, this law sets the exact day that the Electoral College meets: The Monday after the second Wednesday of December. On that day (December 14 in 2020) the chosen electors will assemble in each state and formally cast their votes.

This day is a hard deadline, fixed by federal law. States must have their electors chosen by then. In fact, the Electoral Count Act explicitly accounts for what to do if a disputed election or other problem means electors cannot be chosen by voters:

Whenever any State has held an election for the purpose of choosing electors, and has failed to make a choice on the day prescribed by law, the electors may be appointed on a subsequent day in such a manner as the legislature of such State may direct. [Legal Information Institute]

In other words, federal law explicitly empowers state legislators to decide how a state’s electoral votes should be awarded, even after election day, if that election “failed to make a choice.” Certainly, such a “failure” would include a fraud-ridden election whose outcome cannot be trusted.

It’s a precedent the Supreme Court has endorsed relatively recently. In 2000’s Bush v. Gore ruling, a Court majority affirmed that:

…the State legislature’s power to select the manner for appointing electors is plenary; it may, if it so chooses, select the electors itself. … The State, of course, after granting the franchise in the special context of Article II, can take back the power to appoint electors. See id., at 35 (“[T]here is no doubt of the right of the legislature to resume the power at any time, for it can neither be taken away nor abdicated”)  [Legal Information Institute]

Princeton political science professor Keith Whittington, who otherwise opposes state legislatures intervening in the 2020 election, admits in a recent piece that “The Constitution arguably gives state legislatures the power to appoint presidential electors right up until the day the electors meet to cast their ballots.”

In the case of a stolen election, Republican lawmakers, then, should not feel ashamed or hide away from what the law plainly empowers them to do. This would not be an act of usurping the will of the people, it would instead be a noble and heroic act of restoring the will of the people that was viciously taken away from them in the dead of night.

With each passing day, it looks more and more clear that they must seriously consider exercising this power. Evidence is steadily piling up that Democratic leads in the 2020 election’s decisive states are built on a bedrock of fraud.

In Nevada, not only did out-of-state residents vote, but the dead rose from their graves to cast ballots as well. In Fulton County, Georgia, officials told the public they were done counting for the night, and then secretly spent another three hours tallying votes unobserved. In Michigan, a newly-filed lawsuit alleges spectacular levels of fraud in Wayne County. One poll watcher says he forged votes fraudulently added to the state’s qualified voter list. Another person, a Detroit poll watcher, signed an affidavit saying she repeatedly saw city workers coach voters to vote for Joe Biden and other downballot Democrats. These are not flimsy Twitter allegations. They are sworn statements under oath. If the people making these claims are lying, they can be criminally charged.

When enough fraud is found in lesser races to throw the entire outcome into doubt, courts have ordered entirely new elections to be held. But with an office as critical as president, such an option is not feasible. Not only would another presidential election cost too much and take too long, but the Constitution simply does not allow for it. The Constitution explicitly requires a president to be chosen by the Electoral College prior to January 20.

If the 2020 election was stolen, then, only one recourse will remain: Republican-controlled state legislatures must act, and vote to choose Donald Trump’s electors for their Electoral College delegation. They cannot be passive. They cannot simply sit around and let the Trump campaign do all the work, or wait for some state court to tell everyone how things will be. State lawmakers must start setting the agenda right now. They must relentlessly drive forward investigations, and refuse to accept propaganda from the press and ass-covering excuses from left-aligned bureaucrats.

If states cannot satisfactorily demonstrate by December 14 that their voting procedures were legitimate and free of fraud, then the law gives state legislatures no choice but to act to restore the will of the people of their respective states. They will be obligated to pick a slate of Donald Trump-aligned electors, and send their votes to Washington, as the Constitution and Supreme Court explicitly allow.

Source: revolver

Spread the love

By Morgan

One thought on “The Law is Clear: If An Election is Stolen, State Legislatures Can Restore The Will of The People”
  1. I was blocked from entering the PA Dept of State website to file a complaint regarding a Voting Irregularity in Mercer County, PA. Why? Because I use a Virtual Private Network (VPN). To verify my assertion that I am, and was, being blocked by the State of PA from filing a formal complaint, I highlighted specific documentation from the State of PA’s web-page before you are able to enter the complaint form.

    “This website monitors and captures ISP information. By visiting this site, you consent to such monitoring.”

    When a citizen uses a VPN,(Virtual Private Network), which the Government can detect, they block you because your true ISP (Internet Service Provider) information is not readily available to them. The Government should state why they want to track you, what information they intend to acquire on you from your ISP, and what they intend to do with that information; however, they do not. There is no limit to their prying. They can pretty much obtain everything about your life – banking, shopping, who you know, what sites you visit, newsletters you receive, and if you use a cellphone, they can track your whereabouts any time they want, etc. Obviously, if you use a private VPN, your not about to give the Government access because it would violate your 4th Amendment Rights. Basically, the issue is not what the government website claims – That if you’re not a registered voter, you can’t file a complaint. – What it is really saying is this: Even if you are or are not a registered voter, you cannot file a complaint because you won’t relinquish your 4th Amendment rights. I find the sentence “By visiting this site, you consent to such monitoring.” extremely sleazy and contemptible.

    After entering my data, I was rejected from filing a complaint. Here is what the website said: ” No Voter Registration information could be found for the data provided. Either search again using different data or contact your County Voter Registration Office.”

    I am a registered voter. When I reported the above to my County Director of Elections, he entered my data using his government computer and his reply was “I had no problem accessing your information”. My reply to him was this:

    Just because you were able to access Pennsylvania’s website to report voting irregularities, and my voter registration status in Mercer County, it doesn’t mean that I can. You are using a government computer and I am using a laptop running a VPN (virtual private network). It would not make sense for the Government to block your IP address, would it? They can and probably do block access to their website anytime they want to and to whomever they want to, by blocking individual or collective IP Address. (You can run a search to understand IP Blocking.)

    After that exchange, my emails to the Director of Elections, and The Mercer County Commissioners were blocked by the Mercer County Email Security Firm: Baraccuda Networks.

    Fortunately, my State Rep, Mark Longietti, offered to take my statement and deliver it to a contact at the PA Dept of State. He will let me know when he gets a case #. The State website for reporting did not have a download form that you could print out to submit a complaint by snail-mail. I think that the lack of one is highly suspicious and against “proper procedure”.

    Thanks for listening.

Leave a Reply to Diane L Junk Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *